Organizing for America | Nick Kimball's Blog: Stand for Change: Full video of Barack's speech in Des Moines

Are you angry? Are you cynical? or are you hopeful? | Report to Admin

By Dutch in Georgia Dec 27th 2007 at 5:55 pm EST

This, my friends, is the subtext of the campaign for the Democratic Nominee.

While everyone who supports our top candidates have their reasons, it essentially boils down to this:

....if you are angry at the constant slights and backhands of conservatives and the The Man, you are supporting Edwards.

....if you simply want a Democrat, benchwarming in Washington, in the White House you are supporting Clinton.

....if you desire change. Real change and a lasting peace in Washington that will lead to real reform on the real crisis that affects the average American you are supporting Obama.

As I have said many times, Democrats are clearly divided on our choices for President. While we have the support of all types of voters, the base of the Party is split relatively equally among the candidates.

As we enter these final days, we will hear more from Obama about what change really means(hope). But ultimately, this is now a ground game. Our footsoldiers must passionately, but constantly, seek to build a coalition that works around 'the base' and reaches for something greater.

I have worked on many campaigns here in Atlanta. A friend, who ran Shirley Franklin's(our Mayor and Vice-Chair of the Convention in Denver) 1st mayorial race-and a Obama supporter- said Obama must do what she did. Shirley, recognizing Atlanta's changing demographics, did not seek the support of the city's black old guard to win. Instead, she reached out to blacks outside of it, gays, Republicans in the city, and others to form a broader base to push some long held reforms. Shirley is now considered the nation's most effective mayor's as a result.

Obama must weave his equally disparate support into a working majority to push him over the edge next week.

Failing this, as Michelle put it, "all a dream".

Re: Are you angry? Are you cynical? or are you hopeful? | Report to Admin

By bkeithii Dec 27th 2007 at 10:11 pm EST

Barack's speach in Des Moines, was the most presidental speach ever. Iowa must get "Fired up and ready to go" Go get'em Iowa!

Re: Are you angry? Are you cynical? or are you hopeful? | Report to Admin

By Lee Dec 28th 2007 at 1:33 pm EST

I hope Iowa gives Texans a chance to vote for Barack Obama. Even a loss in Iowa (though unlikely) I hope other people of other states can rise above "sign" and "historic presidents" to eliminate the possibility of Clinton taking the throne again. We'll see ... We'll see

Re: Are you angry? Are you cynical? or are you hopeful? | Report to Admin

By Terry from Madera, CA Dec 27th 2007 at 10:24 pm EST

Being angry or cynical requires negative energy. We in the U.S. have had our share of negativity for the past 8 years and then some. Hopeful and upbeat invites good karma and uses less energy, thus leaving some for positive comments and campaigning. Barack IS the only choice, on any of the tickets. He has not been infilitrated by the lobbyists or big business...I believe him when he says he wants to involve the American people in their government again. It feels nice to "feel" again. Barack Obama IS the one...

Re: Are you angry? Are you cynical? or are you hopeful? | Report to Admin

By Dawn Dec 28th 2007 at 2:33 pm EST

"....if you are angry at the constant slights and backhands of conservatives and the The Man, you are supporting Edwards."

You are absolutely right! I don't get Edward's appeal, but it is undeniably resonating with Iowans, especially rural Iowans. He can't win the nomination, but he most certainly can be a spoiler--for Senator Obama--which is what Hillary Clinton is counting on.

Hitting Edwards on 527 support is dead on arrival. Instead of wasting time with that, they should be blanketing Iowa with the recent Newsweek column by Jonathan Alter explaining why Edwards' populist/angry southern White man routine will not play well in a general election--directly countering Edwards' mass mailing of Paul Krugman's anti-Obama columns.dwards is doing.

Iowans needs to understand that angry Edwards (Edwards 2.0) sounds good on the stump, but the stump is as far as it will take him.

Re: Are you angry? Are you cynical? or are you hopeful? | Report to Admin

By Staten Island Edwards for Obama Jan 2nd 2008 at 6:06 pm EST

John Edwards is claiming that he can compete all over the Country and is, therefore, best qualified to be the democratic standard bearer. Please!!! Is this the same John Edwards who lobbied to become John Kerry's running mate and could not even deliver his own State? When John Edwards claims to be the best qualified, he should be confronted with what he did as a senator and had power to exercise the closest thing to presidential decision-making. He, like Hillary, Dodd and Biden had the opportunity to prove that they had the judgement required of every president of the United States, when they had to vote to send people's sons and daughters to fight and die in a war of choice, and they failed miserably. They did not even read the critical Intellegence Estimate on which George Bush claimed the war was based on. Now he, like them, want to be promoted to a bigger job with more responsibility. A job in which the most important decision is, arguably, sending people's children to fight and die when he deems it critical to the Nation's Security. He, like them claims that he made a mistake, but this is not a mistake that you can go back and correct. Some 4,000 of those soldiers, the precious sons and daughters, will never come to their families, again. So this is one time when I am sorroy is not enough. In my mind, that is why only Barack Obama gets my vote.

Re: Are you angry? Are you cynical? or are you hopeful? | Report to Admin

By Staten Island Edwards for Obama Jan 2nd 2008 at 6:28 pm EST

John Edwards is claiming that he can compete all over the Country and is, therefore, best qualified to be the democratic standard bearer. Please!!! Is this the same John Edwards who lobbied to become John Kerry's running mate and could not even deliver his own State? When John Edwards claims to be the best qualified, he should be confronted with what he did as a senator and had power to exercise the closest thing to presidential decision-making. He, like Hillary, Dodd and Biden had the opportunity to prove that he had the judgement required of every president of the United States, when they had to vote to send people's sons and daughters to fight and die in a war of choice, and they failed miserably. They did not even read the critical Intellegence Estimate on which George Bush claimed the war was based. Now he, like them, want to be promoted to a bigger job with more responsibility. A job in which the most important decision is, arguably, sending people's children to fight and die when he deems it critical to the Nation's Security. John Edwards, like them, claims that he made a mistake, but this is not a mistake that you can just revisit and correct. Some 4,000 of those soldiers, the precious sons and daughters of grieving parents, will never come to their families, again. So this is one time when, "I am sorroy", is not enough. In my mind, that is why only Barack Obama gets my vote. Only he exercised the sensitivity and judgement that I expect from my president. He alone, showed that he took the lives of others as if they were his own relatives.

Re: Are you angry? Are you cynical? or are you hopeful? | Report to Admin

By WNYmathGuy Jan 1st 2008 at 11:57 pm EST

I'm angry, cynical, hopeful, and fed up; I'm for Barack 100%.
No matter how extreme I get about my dark views of life I tend to come back to knowing that the majority of the world is good and all will work out. I go about my business and let politics take care of itself.

No more!

I don't know what made me so fed up with things, but for the first time in my life (voting age after Carter) I was motivated to fix broken politics. It wasn't my intent. I was on the internet at lunch time looking for fodder to make fun of candidates and catch all their deceptions, but this fateful day in early April 2007, I stumbled onto the Barack Obama site.

I watched his archive videos sceptically looking for the lie and deception, but found none. It's not because I'm bad at it, it's because hes the real thing. I tried harder to find something wrong with him later that evening using my Economic's knowledge to find fault in his policies and again their was naught.

I shed a tear. For so long I felt as if a truly honest man couldn't get ahead in this world. I accepted my lot in life was to work hard for very little and could only hope to make the lives of my children better. That tear was HOPE! I realized that a man no different than myself, genuinely honest in a profound way, spirited to make the world a better place, willing to work for less because the human effect of his work was more important, was successful enough to be running for the highest office in our land. I love him because I love me, and he is me. We may have never met, but we were forged by the problems of our times. America needs him to win!

I'm doing my part in NY. You may not have heard but this state was supposed to be a slam dunk for Clinton; Ha! Our grass roots were so strong that we have Obama on 29 of the 29 voting districts in NY. Edwards tried, but only got on 8. Nobody else is in sight. (we should change our laws) My hope now is that Barack gets every delegate in every district in NY in the primary.

Lesson learned, human capital beats finincial capital; help out.

Sweet! | Report to Admin

By P.Licavoli Dec 27th 2007 at 5:55 pm EST

Thanks! I know alot of us have been waiting for this!

YAY | Report to Admin

By .mike Dec 27th 2007 at 5:57 pm EST

YAY!

Everyone Please Go To The ACTION CENTER!! | Report to Admin

By Tommy Ates from Austin, TX Dec 27th 2007 at 6:04 pm EST

Sign up at the ACTION CENTER!!

Link

The time is NOW to volunteer remotely if you can't go to an early primary state or if you want to SIGN UP to go to Iowa, New Hampshire, Nevada, or South Carolina.

It's simple, easy, and fun!

The change begins with you.

Together we will defeat Hillary, Inc.

Re: Everyone Please Go To The ACTION CENTER!! | Report to Admin

By Time Words Dec 27th 2007 at 6:11 pm EST

I am no cynic but I remember 2004 bin Laden released a video that hyped the fears of Americans that most likely contributed to Kerry's loss.

The fierce urgency of Now is too urgent, to change the mind set of fear to addressing structures that result in the chaos in the world

Now we have fear being hyped on the last week of the campaign

"She added: “I want you to ask yourself, ‘Who will be the best president? Who, if something happened that none of us can predict now, would be there able to respond and act on behalf of our country immediately?’.” Mrs Clinton also released a new advert entitled “Stakes”, which argued that “America is at a crossroads and needs a steady hand”.

Link

Re: Everyone Please Go To The ACTION CENTER!! | Report to Admin

By Terry from Madera, CA Dec 27th 2007 at 10:27 pm EST (Updated Dec 28th 2007 at 10:49 am EST)

This comment has been removed due to objectionable or disrespectful content.

EVERYONE, We Need To Help David Axelrod: Axelrod Amplifies His Remarks About Clinton and Pakistan! | Report to Admin

By Tommy Ates from Austin, TX Dec 27th 2007 at 6:15 pm EST

Please comment freely. The MSM is looking for their "Dean scream" to derail Obama.
_ _ _ _

I just recieved a call from David Axelrod, Obama's chief strategist, who told me that "in no way" was his comment about Hillary Clinton "meant to be an unprovoked, sort of strategic foray."

"It was an answer to the question -- in no way was I implying that she was personally responsible for what happened."

I asked whether Axelrod meant to imply that her vote was in part responsible for creating the conditions that led to an Al Qaeda resurgance.

"All I’m implying is [about] the policy that the war in Iraq that Obama said in 2002 was going to distract us from Afghanistan and Pakistan and Al Qaeda, and that they would regenerate themselves and that they would become more powerful and influential. He exercised good judgment. She’ll have to explain her position."

Axelrod acknowledged it was fair to say that he was pointing out that votes have consequences, and that the Iraq vote Clinton took in 2002 had specific consequences that may have helped lead to an emboldened Al Qaeda.

"Everyone who was there understands the context. There were 20 reporters there and only one who wrote that. I know that [Clinton spokesman] Phil [Singer] and [communications director] Howard Wolfson are ...trying to stoke the meager, flickering embers, but there's just no fire there."

Link

Re: EVERYONE, We Need To Help David Axelrod: Axelrod Amplifies His Remarks About Clinton and Pakistan! | Report to Admin

By Veico Dec 27th 2007 at 6:26 pm EST

Tommy,

Please post this on the other blog that had the text to the speech. Alot of folks are still on that blog.

Re: EVERYONE, We Need To Help David Axelrod: Axelrod Amplifies His Remarks About Clinton and Pakistan! | Report to Admin

By Tommy Ates from Austin, TX Dec 27th 2007 at 6:29 pm EST

Will do. Thanks!

Re: EVERYONE, We Need To Help David Axelrod: Axelrod Amplifies His Remarks About Clinton and Pakistan! | Report to Admin

By ayak Hussein va Dec 27th 2007 at 10:07 pm EST

obama's foreign policy chief needs to be out there in full swing tomorrow explaining obama s policy in pakistan and let the media know that obama s vision about pakistan is the correct one not the clinton vision which took us to iraq and to clarify the confusion CNN (clinton news network)
is trying to generate about alexrod s comments.
obama needs to come out forcefully tomorrow ;
they should go on the networks and debate this
pakistan issue (hillary and obama) then we will
see clearly that clinton has no foreign policy stand regarding pakistan; she is just as confused as bush ; we need to play this to our advantage
and not let hillary take credit for obama s
foreign policy regarding pakistan ; because
as we know her she will repeat obama s policy and claim that its her policy ; she cant vaguely
state that you need to have a steady hand leadership and get a pass ; she must elaborate
on her own substance if she has any. she will lose hand down to obama on this pakistan issue;
i Know it and we need to capitalize on this ;
call her to participate in one of the networks
say chris mathew or fox or wahtever to state
the substances of her pakistani policy;

Re: EVERYONE, We Need To Help David Axelrod: Axelrod Amplifies His Remarks About Clinton and Pakistan! | Report to Admin

By Time Words Dec 27th 2007 at 6:29 pm EST

Still Obama's foreign policy advisors need to get into the circuits since the MSM have found their chance to re anoint and crown Hilary.

Obama who spelt out the best foreign policy way back in August, putting clearly the situation in Pakistan in perspective is receiving no hearing.

It is fear again, rally behind Washington conventional thinking and policies and maintain the status quo. This is the path America cannot afford to take, but no one is drawing this distinction.
Obama's message on Pakistan needs to appear in the news circuits forcefully and clearly as in his closing statement

Re: EVERYONE, We Need To Help David Axelrod: Axelrod Amplifies His Remarks About Clinton and Pakistan! | Report to Admin

By Unknown user Dec 27th 2007 at 6:38 pm EST

I've posted a response. Thanks for the link.

Re: Relax, Axelrod(and Obama) are RIGHT! | Report to Admin

By Dutch in Georgia Dec 27th 2007 at 6:55 pm EST

They are SO right. But this misses the point. Bhutto's death is tragic to be sure. But to spin this from any campaign for the need for 'experienced' hands in a 'dangerous' world strikes anyone as unseemly and wrong headed.

I will say this again: Senator Obama is possessed of the remarkable combination of judgement and foresight. This, and this alone, is what matters in dealing with an unstable world. He foresaw the debacle of Iraq, and it's consequences. And this sadly includes the assassination of this remarkable leader.

What we need in our Presidents, in THESE times, is someone who knows how to speak honestly to Americans about the threats we face, challenge us to see them as opportunities, and who has the conviction to teach us that HOPE, not FEAR, will guide us to victory.

Pick your example, but for me the life and times of two men who also were told they 'weren't ready' for the Big Time-Lincoln and King- stand out in this moment. Both led by clearly stating that times, and life, will have it's difficulties. But the response to those times is not to recoil in fear, or strike out in anger, but to stridently stare down our challenges.

This, not decades in Washington, is what matters.

Experience is important. But Leadership matters more in dangerous and uncertain times. With sound judgement, you simply cannot claim to be a leader.

Re: EVERYONE, We Need To Help David Axelrod: Axelrod Amplifies His Remarks About Clinton and Pakistan! | Report to Admin

By Marbwi Dec 27th 2007 at 6:46 pm EST

The so-called 'Dean scream was after(not before) Iowa.

Re: EVERYONE, We Need To Help David Axelrod: Axelrod Amplifies His Remarks About Clinton and Pakistan! | Report to Admin

By Tommy Ates from Austin, TX Dec 27th 2007 at 7:31 pm EST

It was the same day.

Re: EVERYONE, We Need To Help David Axelrod: Axelrod Amplifies His Remarks About Clinton and Pakistan! | Report to Admin

By Justine from Fort Pierce, FL Jan 1st 2008 at 9:02 am EST

I don't think the Axelrod comments are going to become an issue with voters. We are smart enough to understand that his comments were taken well out of context!!! This is already a non-issue in my opinion!!!

A CAMBODIAN BEER FOR BARACK | Report to Admin

By Eric from Cambodia Dec 27th 2007 at 6:26 pm EST

A CAMBODIAN BEER FOR BARACK Link

HELP!!! | Report to Admin

By marytnurse, supporting Barack Obama until I see his library built on donations from We The People Dec 27th 2007 at 6:38 pm EST

Does anyone have the link to Diamond's DK blog (I think it was DK) about Republican support for Barack? Need it for a Republican who might be able to come on board with support....but need it soon!

Re: HELP!!! | Report to Admin

By Barath Dec 27th 2007 at 6:48 pm EST

Is this it?

Link

Re: HELP!!! | Report to Admin

By meta Dec 27th 2007 at 6:50 pm EST

Here you go:

Link

and Repubs for Obama:

Link

Re: HELP!!! | Report to Admin

By marytnurse, supporting Barack Obama until I see his library built on donations from We The People Dec 27th 2007 at 7:05 pm EST

Thank you both, yes! And the other one is a great link as well! Barath, good one to add to the across the aisles thing! (also that thing about Jim Leach, well respected recently defeated Congressman from Second District (East Central and Southeast Iowa); Jim was YEARS long in the House, before being defeated by Dave Loebsack, who also endorsed Barack last weekend!

From Paul Tewes, Iowa campaign director;

And last week, former Republican Congressman Jim Leach said this about Barack:

[Barack Obama] provides the best chance on the Democratic side to change America's image in the world. Unlike the Democratic front runner and the majority of Democrats and Republicans in Congress, he opposed from the start the war in Iraq and he opposed two months ago the resolution to give the president authority to use force against Iran. Uniquely, he isn't afraid to negotiate with adversaries.

David Axelrod: People Please respond to defend on CNN Ticker!! | Report to Admin

By Tommy Ates from Austin, TX Dec 27th 2007 at 6:43 pm EST

Comments can and do influence coverage. We need to back down this CNN smear. ASAP!!
_ _ _

Obama advisor links Clinton vote and Bhutto death?
Posted: 06:20 PM ET

DES MOINES, Iowa (CNN) — In comments to reporters after Barack Obama's first speech Thursday, his chief strategist David Axelrod seemed to link Hillary Clinton’s vote on Iraq and the death of Benazir Bhutto, Pakistan's former prime minister.

"Barack Obama had the judgment to oppose the war in Iraq. And he warned at the time that it would divert us from Afghanistan and Al Qaeda, and now we see the effect of that,” said Axelrod. “Al Qaeda is resurgent. They’re a powerful force now in Pakistan….There’s a suspicion they may have been involved in this. I think his judgment was good. Senator Clinton made a different judgment. Let’s have that discussion.”Axelrod was responding to reporters' questions whether Bhutto's assassination enhances claims that her foreign policy experience may make her more fit to serve as commander-in-chief.

“I think people need to judge where these candidates were and what they’ve said and what they’ve done on these issues,” said Axelrod. “I mean, she was a strong supporter of the war in Iraq, which we would submit is one of the reasons why we were diverted from Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Al Qaeda who may have been players in this event today. So that’s a judgment she’ll have to defend.”

Link

Re: David Axelrod: People Please respond to defend on CNN Ticker!! | Report to Admin

By raette Dec 27th 2007 at 6:47 pm EST

I don't see anything wrong with the comment. IMHO people will not be fooled by MSM on this.

Re: David Axelrod: People Please respond to defend on CNN Ticker!! | Report to Admin

By Evan from San Mateo, CA Dec 27th 2007 at 6:51 pm EST

Clinton is not the only one trying to use Bhutto's untimely death in her favor. McCain who also voted for the war is saying "that he doesn’t want political unrest and Bhutto’s death in Pakistan to be a “political gain” for anyone, McCain is certainly reminding everyone how experienced he is with Pakistan and that he has the “most judgment.”

Source: Link

She was not our elected official and it is unfortunate that she was murdered but using her death for immoral gain by any politician is despicable.

Re: David Axelrod: People Please respond to defend on CNN Ticker!! | Report to Admin

By meta Dec 27th 2007 at 6:55 pm EST

This disgusting and crass. They are all acting like ambulance chasers.

Re: David Axelrod: People Please respond to defend on CNN Ticker!! | Report to Admin

By Tammy Dec 27th 2007 at 7:37 pm EST

Meta,

I blurted out a huge laugh after reading your comment. So true.

Re: David Axelrod: People Please respond to defend on CNN Ticker!! | Report to Admin

By Terri Dec 27th 2007 at 6:52 pm EST

I posted my comment at 5:03 and it still shows it's 'awaiting moderation'. jeez...

Re: David Axelrod: People Please respond to defend on CNN Ticker!! | Report to Admin

By MTT Dec 27th 2007 at 6:56 pm EST

David Axelrod was right on - nothing to apologize for. He is right to point this out right now - policy decisions have consequences and Hillary is batting zero.

Re: David Axelrod: People Please respond to defend on CNN Ticker!! | Report to Admin

By Marbwi Dec 27th 2007 at 7:02 pm EST

REPORTER: But looking ahead, does the assassination put on the front burner foreign policy credentials in the closing days?

AXELROD: Well, it puts on the table foreign policy judgment, and that's a discussion we welcome. Barack Obama had the judgment to oppose the war in Iraq, and he warned at the time it would divert us from Afghanistan and Al Qaeda, and now we see the effect of that. Al Qaeda's resurgent, they're a powerful force now in Pakistan, they may have been involved — we've been here, so I don't know whether the news has been updated, but there's a suspicion they may have been involved in this. I think his judgment was good. Sen. Clinton made a different judgment, so let's have that discussion.

Re: David Axelrod: People Please respond to defend on CNN Ticker!! | Report to Admin

By Amy Dec 27th 2007 at 7:06 pm EST

I think the answer is excellent.

The invasion of Iraq fanned the flames of terrorism in middle eastern countries. There's no denying it. Those who voted to turn away from the problems of the terrorist activity in the Afghanistan/Pakistan area of the world voted to take our eye off the ball.

But more to the point, Axelrod is referring specifically to the suggestion that because Bhutto was assasinated, Hillary would benefit. It was the reporter whose question linked the death of the woman to Hillary, not Axelrod.

OMG !! She stole another line from Obama | Report to Admin

By Terri Dec 27th 2007 at 6:47 pm EST

(CNN) — Hillary Clinton’s campaign debuted a new television ad in South Carolina Thursday, a month before that state’s Democratic presidential primary.

The 60-second spot, titled “Stand By Us,” highlights the New York senator’s record on universal health care, including benefits for National Guard and Reserve members, and on Social Security.

“Hillary stood up for universal health care when almost no one else would, and kept standing until almost 6 million kids had coverage. She stood up for seniors by fighting this administration’s plan to head Social Security over to Wall Street and kept standing until Bush backed down,” says the announcer.

“She stood by our National Guard and Reserve and kept standing until every member had access to the health care they deserve. Hillary spent 35 years standing up for people. As President, she’ll stand up for you.”

========

OMG... does she have no shame?? I mean, REALLY!!

New Poll | Report to Admin

By Aman from Saint Louis, MO Dec 27th 2007 at 6:51 pm EST

Hey Guys,

Just to let you know that there is a new poll out with BHO leading. Just to prove that the previous poll from ARG was misleading.

Link

Re: New Poll | Report to Admin

By raette Dec 27th 2007 at 6:56 pm EST

Thank you for posting. I knew that ARG poll was faulty.

ARG -- not trustworthy? | Report to Admin

By Andrew Lietzow Dec 27th 2007 at 8:58 pm EST

I thought there were problems with these two most recent polls from ARG, both showing HRC with this sizeable gain and absolutely nothing happening that would have enable that kind of a jump. I addressed this here. Link

Don't know that I am right but when other reputable pollsters are showing something much different, and in both IA and NH, their methodology should be highly suspect. Does anyone know whether there is a vetting process for these polling companies? Do they have to meet certain professional certification levels before they can be considered worthy of national reporting of their results?

Just who owns ARG? Is there an inherent bias built into the way people ask the questions? Glad so see their results have quickly been refuted by what seems to be a more reputable organization. If anyone knows more about ARG, please email me, or send me a link. TIA, Andrew L.

Bad day maybe? | Report to Admin

By Danny Uko Dec 27th 2007 at 6:48 pm EST

Hello to all. Bad news. Bhuddo was killed today and Chris Matthews said today this is bad for Obama and good for Hillary. what should we do?

Re: Bad day maybe? | Report to Admin

By Cilla...Currently living in Spain and lovin' it Dec 27th 2007 at 6:50 pm EST

Nothing.

Re: Bad day maybe? | Report to Admin

By Danny Uko Dec 27th 2007 at 6:52 pm EST

but if we do nothing Obama might go down.

Re: Bad day maybe? | Report to Admin

By ♋Tanner♋ Dec 27th 2007 at 6:54 pm EST

Obama is not going down.

Re: Bad day maybe? | Report to Admin

By Terri Dec 27th 2007 at 6:54 pm EST

Ok, do something. There's a 'donate' button you can push. Obama will take care of the rest as he always does.

Re: Bad day maybe? | Report to Admin

By Danny Uko Dec 27th 2007 at 6:56 pm EST

I have no Money

Re: Bad day maybe? | Report to Admin

By Athena Dec 27th 2007 at 7:07 pm EST

You can post comments in the news blogs and explain WHY Our Candidate would be the best person to deal with a situation like this.

For example, you can visit this NYT blog about this topic and post a comment. Here is what I said (under a different pseudonym):

"This murder simply confirms what Obama, more than any other candidate in this election, has been pointing to all along: that Pakistan is a truly unstable country in crisis, that our priority is to deal with terrorism, and that such movements (if you can call them that) are festering in Pakistan.

His much-criticized assessment was made months ago, when it wasn’t “popular.” Similarly, he spoke out against the folly of the was the invasion of Iraq long before that was “popular.”

Obama is the leader we need. He has the instinct and the judgement to assess world events BEFORE they stare the pundits and other politicians in the eye.

America, I say, the moment is yours. Seize it in these elections.

— Posted by Lioness "

To read the blog and post your own comment:

Link

Visit the other major news blogs and do the same. You can contribute a lot that way.

Remember: one pundit's opinion is only that.

Re: Bad day maybe? | Report to Admin

By Amy Dec 27th 2007 at 7:08 pm EST

Join the call team and make calls in support of Obama.

Re: Bad day maybe? | Report to Admin

By Tammy Dec 27th 2007 at 7:40 pm EST

Go borrow some.

Re: Bad day maybe? | Report to Admin

By Cole Dec 27th 2007 at 9:56 pm EST

Danny, with the ever increasing price hikes on food, gas and the basic cost of living it hard for a family of 4, to say the least 7!!! can make it now days. I am barely keeping my family sheltered, feed and clothe. I’m a mother of 5 young boys who work FT, and am very active in their academic and extra curricular activities. I have a husband that I love dearly and care for as a loving wife alt to do, so when the day is said and done, I barely have time for myself let alone volunteering my time to a presidential candidate that the media had portrayed as having no chance in hell in winning when he first began his quest. But, I believe in Barack's abilities to inspire and lead us to change. At first, I use to be intimidated logging on to Barack's site because I felt ashamed that I had nothing to contribute to Barack's Campaign. But as I read other supporters post and viewed past speeches made by Barack. I had come to realize that giving money is not the only way someone could contribute and make a difference. I had read a post by someone who had suggested going to other site posting comments about Barack. Another supporter suggested writing editorial for you local newspaper. Canvassing, Phone Banks, House Parties, Voter Registration and like what I do, I send tons of e-mails reminding folks to register to vote in the early primary states. Barack said every bite help and I truly believe him. This is another reason I believe in his abilities to unite people in our country that comes from different means of life. So you see Danny, you to can make a difference if you really want to. Barack has made me feel like I have.

Also let me take the time to thank Barack and his Family for taking the initiative to “Stand Up for Change” our country. It has been a long time coming.

Nicole “Cole”
Republic, Mo

Re: Bad day maybe? | Report to Admin

By .mike Dec 27th 2007 at 6:54 pm EST

Not at all...

This has been a great day for us.

If anything, today's events actually solidify Obama's anti-war stance and how we moved our eyes off the ball. We carelessly invaded Iraq and now all bets are off. The countries in the region are more unstable.

Hillary has voted for the war with "conviction"! She was wrong.

Keep the chin up. Echo the same optimism about today's event whenever you get a chance and we'll sail through the caucuses

Re: Bad day maybe? | Report to Admin

By Danny Uko Dec 27th 2007 at 6:58 pm EST

well i still believe Obama can win Iowa. He Just needs to stop the lies of Hillary and run more ads.

Re: Bad day maybe? | Report to Admin

By Tommy Ates from Austin, TX Dec 27th 2007 at 6:58 pm EST

Luckily for us, the national news made no negative comments for Obama. Meanwhile, there is plenty you can do, 1) make comments on this links provided in this section. 2) Go to the Action Center: Link
Register and call people in Massachusetts to go canvassing in New Hampshire. Just make 10 phone calls a day. It can make all the difference. Or 3) Sign up to go to Iowa, New Hampshire, Nevada, or South Carolina.

Re: Bad day maybe? | Report to Admin

By Tina Dec 27th 2007 at 6:59 pm EST

Why is this so bad for Barack and good for Hillary-this situation will come to a head long
before the next Prez even takes office. Really! We cannot allow fear to color our judgements anymore. We've had almost 7 yrs. of that with Bush.

Re: Bad day maybe? | Report to Admin

By Jen Deep in the Heart Dec 27th 2007 at 7:25 pm EST

I keep scratching my head over this. I don't get how all of a sudden the pundits think this assassination is going to make Hillary look strong and experienced. I asked my husband if I was just being one-sided, but he agrees with me that this isn't going to affect anyone's vote. (Well, most people, I suppose).

Re: Bad day maybe? | Report to Admin

By Tammy Dec 27th 2007 at 7:45 pm EST

Average Americans won't see it the way pundits do. Pundits have been looking for something to talk about and this is it.

I think the Bhutto story got way too much coverage. It was on all channels all day. You would have thought it was the American president. Yes, she was a wonderful person. Yes, she was a great friend to our country. But who didn't see this coming?

Bhutto had raggedy security. She was very vocal about her support for our government. Al Qaeda was gunning for her. Members of the Pakistani government was gunning for her. Her assassination was no surprise.

Re: Bad day maybe? Maybe not. | Report to Admin

By Tom Smith Dec 27th 2007 at 9:39 pm EST

The pundints all are saying this is a minor benefit for Clinton and Biden on the Democratic side, and for Giuliani and McCain on the Republican side. However, I believe that the impact will be neglagable on the Democratic side, and small help to McCain on the Republican side. When Clinton made her statemebt about today's tragic events, the crowd seemed to show strong disinterest. As for McCain, it helps him since this issue has more sway on the Republican side, and the race is so mixed up right now that there is no Republican frontrunner at this point.

Re: Bad day maybe? | Report to Admin

By DeeKay Dec 27th 2007 at 7:00 pm EST

If Barack had followed Chris Matthews logic to go on full attack mode against Hillary back in the days when Barack was low in the polls, I think his campaign would have been in tatters by now. Forget the pundits. We go straight to the people with the facts and truths.

Re: Bad day maybe? | Report to Admin

By JQ Dec 27th 2007 at 7:42 pm EST

DeeKay you are right about that.

Re: Bad day maybe? | Report to Admin

By Carol-STL-MO Dec 28th 2007 at 12:59 am EST

NO such thing as a "bad day" when you are POSITIVE, an optimist, & believe... & "I Believe" in Obama.

Stop talking & start doing ...Keep working to the "finish line" folks...we are almost there !!!!

Re: Bad day maybe? | Report to Admin

By dorothy Dec 28th 2007 at 11:06 am EST

I agree with you. Most of the pundits do not know a thing about the genuine daily concerns of average Americans. Unless it is in our back yard, most of us do not live in a state of perpetual fear of attacks from another country. Most of us are busy trying to work jobs, manage families, and pay our bills.

Albeit Pat Roberson, Brit Humes, Wolf Blitzer, Lou Dobbs, Bill O'Reilly, David Shuster, and to be fair, a few others, they have been humbled a bit over the years, because the public has ofter proven them wrong,thank God, all too often. The aforementioned, and their similar contemporaries, all made it plain from the beginning that the Senator Obama's campaign was a just a little mist blowing in the win. Later, when it became apparent that this campaign was not built upon superficiality, the mimimization of the Senator's experience became an issue.
When they found out that most of us do not care about the Washington experience, but relevant, genuine life experience and character, they were more guarded in their attacks.

Poor Ms. Bhutto, she means nothing to them, she is just another means to argue their position with an American public that either does not watch them or either wise enough to read through the bias and conjecture. Relevant experience and character still counts for a lot of us.

The fact that Senator Clinton knew Ms. Bhutto and/or that Senator Edwards talked on the phone to someone, so what? Once again, we have just entered into "the spin zone." We will just keep on pushing with the positivity.

Not so much | Report to Admin

By MTT Dec 27th 2007 at 7:02 pm EST

Calm down. Frankly stuff like this is in the headlines for a day or so and then just disappears. If it persists, I say respond with exactly what Axelrod said today i.e. policy decisions have consequences and what happened to Bhutto and the overall situation in Pakistan is a result of that. This administration is a failure and anyone who has voted with this administration (Hillary) will be a failure.

Re: Bad day maybe? | Report to Admin

By meta Dec 27th 2007 at 7:05 pm EST

For anyone who doesn't know what to do, stop falling for the crass manipulation of the media. Turn off CNN. You keep expecting them to be fair and they have proven time and again that they are not capable of being respectful to Barack Obama. The MSM are a train wreck right now to gear up their viewership and create the drama they need to keep everyone hooked on their patent stupidity. They are all like ambulance chasers. Turn it off and listen to Barack. He's been warning us for awhile now. Take action to bring in new supporters.

Re:THE WAR WE NEED TO WIN | Report to Admin

By Marbwi Dec 27th 2007 at 7:08 pm EST

Read this and watch the video
Link

http://link.brightcove.com/ser vices/link/bcpid1126056719/bct id1125863588

"If God be for you, who can stand against you" | Report to Admin

By "Road " Scholar Dec 27th 2007 at 8:33 pm EST

Many month ago I suggested to you to stop watching the, EMBEDDED MEDIA. Some of you agreed and took my advice. Your blood pressure is down. Your cholesterol is now under control. And you have more time for your mate. Right mate. So let us all concentrate on winning this election for our candidate, Senator Barack Obama. Only (7) days to go and our opponents are scrambling to find more mud and dirty tricks. Let me suggest one other thing: Let's use our time and energy to send a vote of confidence and support to the, "Iowa Precinct Captains and Volunteers. So let's get off our backsides and stop reading the print and turn-off the electronic media. If you must know what the media is saying, go to; HQ OBAMA. Continue to pray for the, Obama family and victory in the Iowa caucuse, Jan. 3rd 2008. Can't you feel it? I can. You should too.

Re: Bad day maybe? | Report to Admin

By marytnurse, supporting Barack Obama until I see his library built on donations from We The People Dec 27th 2007 at 7:11 pm EST

Danny, I have a recipe to share with you, that should keep your CONCERNS at bay, since I'm CONCERNED that you are SO CONCERNED about all these CONCERNS!!!

Link
It's a recipe for angel cookies. Now try not to be so CONCERNED.

And y'all...avoid the underside of bridges.

I'm back to making phone calls!

Re: Bad day maybe? | Report to Admin

By Terri Dec 27th 2007 at 7:19 pm EST

:)

Re: Bad day maybe? | Report to Admin

By Foreigner Dec 27th 2007 at 7:20 pm EST

Love it :-)

Bad day maybe? | Report to Admin

By Michele from Huntington Beach, CA Dec 27th 2007 at 7:42 pm EST

LOL again and again and again.

Re: Bad day maybe? | Report to Admin

By Carol-STL-MO Dec 28th 2007 at 12:52 am EST

NO such thing as a "Bad Day" when you are POSITIVE, an optimist & Believe... & "I believe" in Obama !!!

Breathe People! | Report to Admin

By ♋Tanner♋ Dec 27th 2007 at 6:52 pm EST

I have noticed a surge of panic on this blog. Breathe people. Right now this is in the hands of the voters in Iowa and New Hampshire. The voters in these states meet the candidates close up. They know what to do. We all know this was going to get really rough in the final days.

The pundits have gotten everything wrong during this campaign. What have they said correctly in the past few months? NOTHING!! They tried to dismiss Barack Obama 10 months ago until they saw all of the donations and support. They said HRC was inevitable. PLEASE! I don't know anyone who is supporting HRC. I will be so glad when January 3rd is over. Barack is going to win. Maybe then we can exhale.

FOCUS ON OBAMA NOT THE DRAMA!!

OBAMA '08 AND '12

Re: Breathe People! | Report to Admin

By Marbwi Dec 27th 2007 at 6:55 pm EST

tanner, I totally agree. Too much Hillary reference on an Obama blogsite. There are plenty of generic sites elsewhere to post the type of stuff that use up so much of this blog.

Re: Breathe People! | Report to Admin

By Time Words Dec 27th 2007 at 6:58 pm EST

I must say I was depressed at this issue but it is re-stating how Obama has been right all along

Link

Re: Breathe People! | Report to Admin

By Amy Dec 27th 2007 at 7:14 pm EST

Exactly. It is a way to remind Americans that the policies of the last decade with regard to dealing with terrorism are a failure. Obama was right - fanning the flames of terrorism is not the right approach. We need common sense, some foresight, and some good judgment. His predictions about the war were spot on.

No other candidate has that clear statement of consequences to fall back on. Policies have consequences.

Re: Breathe People! | Report to Admin

By Luis Dec 27th 2007 at 7:03 pm EST

Now more than ever,we have to be united,optimistic,not fearful of what the media says,but lets continue to support Barack the same way we did yesterday before the Pakistan event occured.

Ahora mas que nunca estemos optimistas,unidos y sin miedo por lo que los medios dicen.Vamos a seguir respaldando a Barack con el mismo entusiasmo que fue ayer antes del atentado en Pakistan.

OBAMA 08

Re: Breathe People! | Report to Admin

By Steph from Beverly Hills, CA Dec 27th 2007 at 6:57 pm EST

New poll
Its close in Iowa

Obama 30%
Clinton 29%
Edwards 28%

Link

Re: Breathe People! | Report to Admin

By Andrew Lietzow Dec 27th 2007 at 9:12 pm EST

It's a great race, but what these polls show is that it's a tight race. They do not and cannot predict the winner. What we know about Iowa is that after the first preference groups have been counted, there will be likely be several groups who are not viable.

In our precinct, there will be about 300+ people, so the 15% threshold means a candidate much have 45 supporters to win a delegate. Kucinich, Dodd, possibly Biden and Richardson, will all not be viable after the first round.

So for all those folks who are not in Iowa that night, but support Barack, your job will be to pray that those folks, and the undecideds, break mostly for Barack. If that's true, there is a very real possibility that we could end the night with a 5-3-2 outcome, since we have 10 delegates being selected. Pray instead that we will actually have a 7-2-1 or 6-2-2 outcome. That's what I'll be praying for, for my precinct and for all precinct around Iowa.

With the number of Indies and Repubs who will be standing up for Barack, I think this is not only feasible, but probable. I think I'd better get back to it and work to make that happen!

Our candidate is making this MUCH easier with his "Closing Arguments" tour. We'll be "standing for change" in just 7 days!

Re: Breathe People! | Report to Admin

By Tommy Ates from Austin, TX Dec 27th 2007 at 7:02 pm EST

We are, but I don't believe being relaxed and expect Barack to win. Hillary, Inc. has the money, politicians, pundits, CNN, and the Republican party advocating her candidacy. Don't let others decide Change, but if you do, the establishment will win every time. Please if you can, go to the Action Center:

Link

Just 10 calls a day can change the world!

Re: Breathe People! | Report to Admin

By meta Dec 27th 2007 at 7:14 pm EST

That the media instantly ran with some sort of manufactured connection between this assassination and this election is a crass and cynical manipulation. This is exactly what Barack is talking about when he says that we need to change the politics of pettiness and divisiveness. Only in America can we turn a tragedy for Pakistan and its people into a craven and opportunistic 24/7 news cycle bluster about HRC. This is sick.

Re: Breathe People! | Report to Admin

By Andrew Lietzow Dec 27th 2007 at 9:15 pm EST

Amen. This really is sick!

Re: Breathe People! | Report to Admin

By Kristian "I Ain't Afraid of No GOPs" Idol Dec 28th 2007 at 3:04 am EST

Amen.

Re: Breathe People! | Report to Admin

By Mil from Culpeper, VA Dec 27th 2007 at 7:15 pm EST

Obama on the rise...
Link

Re: Breathe People! | Report to Admin

By Asmeret, a proud member of the Millennium Movement that will deliver Obama to the White House Dec 27th 2007 at 7:29 pm EST

I agree Tanner.We have 7 days left!

FOR THOSE PANICKING AND CONTINUE TO BRING NEGATIVE ATMOSPHERE HERE Obama would want you to get out there and campaign NOT panic! What would Obama say if he saw your fear here? ON THE VERGE OF A HISTORIC VICTORY FOR AMERICA AND THE WORLD-WHAT WOULD MLK AND OTHER GREAT PEOPLE WHO SACRIFICED THEMSELVES SAY ABOUT US? WHERE IS OUR COLLECTIVE FAITH? WHERE IS OUR COLLECTIVE HOPE?
WE ARE THE BEST ORGANISED MOVEMENT IN IOWA-DONT YOU SEE THEY KNOW WE WILL WIN AND ARE THROWING EVERYTHING AT US? DO NOT FALL FOR IT-LETS CONTINUE FOLLOW OBAMA'S LEAD AND TAKE THE HIGH ROAD.LOOK HOW FAR WE'VE COME-WE ARE ALMOST THERE!

WE HAVE COME TOO FAR,I REPEAT TOO FAR TO PANIC and be ruled by FEAR NOW!

WE HAVE HAD TOO MANY SACRIFICES DEMONSTRATED BY MILLIONS SUPPORTING OBAMA and ALL of US!

TOO MANY MOTHERS, FATHERS, DAUGHTERS, SONS, WIVES,HUSBANDS,WORKERS,HOMELES S(YES-OUR VERY OWN INCREDIBLE, HEROIC,PATRIOTIC,HONORABLE DANIELLE IS A HOMELESS VET CARING FOR THE ELDERLY,SLEEPING IN A CAR),YOUNG,OLD,HEALTHY AND ILL,EDUCATED AND UNEDUCATED,SOLDIER OR CIVILIAN, AND COUNTLESS MORE sacrificed for US!

You have no right to be panicking-no right!
So many have spent what LITTLE money they have For US!

So many have signed our ballot petitions across the country for US!

SO MANY THROUGH SNOW AND HEAT WALKED FOR US!

SO MANY PEOPLE THIS CAMPAIGN PERSONALLY PROFILED AT LEAST ONCE EVERY WEEK ON THE BLOGS SACRIFICED FOR US!

They stood up for US! Now we must stand up for them here in the blog world and our world!

This is the last 7 days-expect hell but dont WAVER! WE MUST TRUST THE CAMPAIGN AND STATE AND EDUCATE EVERYONE THAT VISIT THIS SITE,SEEN OR UNSEEN WHY WE SHOULD WIN!

HELP OBAMA STATE THE CASE FOR HIS PRESIDENCY HERE AND EVERYWHERE,WE MUST REPRESENT OURSELVES THE WAY WE WANT OBAMA TO REPRESENT US!

NOW GET A GRIP AND GET BACK TO WORK GUYS-LETS STAY POSITIVE AND STEEL OUR RESOLVE-WE WILL GET MUCH WORSE TREATMENT IN THE GENERAL ELECTION,THEY ARE GOING TO THROW EVERYTHING AT US-IN 7 DAYS THROUGH THICK AND THIN WE WILL EVENTUALLY WIN!

ASMERET

IN OBAMA WE TRUST

Re: Breathe People! | Report to Admin

By Chillrobski Dec 27th 2007 at 7:43 pm EST

I agree. The Clinton machine will be out to spin anything Obama's campaign says. We need to focus on why Obama is best for he job! He is fighting a battle. We should not allow our selves to worry about nonsense. We can't let the press derail us. The American people can see through political crap! Instead of worrying about Clinton lets work to get Obama elected. Let Obama's hard work inspire us no matter what happens. WE CAN CHANGE THE WORLD! Obama 08!

Re: Breathe People! | Report to Admin

By IA for Obama ☮ Dec 27th 2007 at 8:51 pm EST

Right freakin' on, Asmeret

Re: Breathe People! | Report to Admin

By TCP (Tim Prudhel) Dec 27th 2007 at 8:19 pm EST

“The real gamble in this election is playing the same Washington game with the same Washington players and expecting a different result. And that’s a risk we can’t take. Not this year. Not when the stakes are this high.”--Senator Barack Obama - Stand for Change Speech in Des Moines Today

This campaign isn't just a matter of setting the record straight about Barack or his positions.

It's about proving that a new kind of campaign -- funded by ordinary people who want something better for all of us -- can defeat the same tired, old political textbook that so many Americans just don't trust anymore.

Make your donation now to make it happen: Link

True Change with Barack Obama | Report to Admin

By Chase Dec 27th 2007 at 6:57 pm EST

This is all I need to hear. This is what I have been waiting on him to say. Im in, completely, and I have no doubt that Barack Obama will bring true change for all of us.

"The real gamble in this election is playing the same Washington game with the same Washington players and expecting a different result."
-Barack Obama

Re: True Change with Barack Obama | Report to Admin

By Cilla...Currently living in Spain and lovin' it Dec 27th 2007 at 7:04 pm EST

WILL WE EVER SEE THE DAY when Clinton and Obama names are not mentioned in the same sentence??? When we will ever see the day that the Clinton's no longer are in the D.C. stronghold on dem.party??? YOU KNOW WHAT??? JAN. 2009 CAN'T GET HERE SOON ENOUGH. THE ONLY POLL THAT WILL HAVE ANY MEANING IS THE NOV.2008 POLL. People on this blog over react to EVERYTHING OBAMA ALL THE TIME. You still have not learned how to ignor the MSM. CAN'T WAIT FOR THIS TO GET FINISHED.

Re: True Change with Barack Obama | Report to Admin

By meta Dec 27th 2007 at 7:16 pm EST

Cilla, I was just thinking that I wished Barack would stop using Clinton's quote. I'm sick of people comparing Barack and Bill Clinton. They are not even in the same ballpark.

Re: True Change with Barack Obama | Report to Admin

By waterprise2 Dec 27th 2007 at 7:28 pm EST

Hi...the reason I like using that clip is that since Hillary is riding Bill's coattails, Bill endorsed Barack back in 1992!

What does that say!?!?!?

But I agree...let's all take a deep breath. Most of us are away from Iowa and New Hampshire, and after we've donated, talked to our friends and family, etc., don't have any thing else to do except worry.

We cannot operate from fear! We see where that got us before!!

We need to concentrate on one thing only...winning Iowa!!

Fired Up!
Ready to Go!
Obama '08!

Re: True Change with Barack Obama | Report to Admin

By Chase Dec 27th 2007 at 8:04 pm EST

...well bottom line for me is either you want change or you don’t.

I know people have to look at Hillary and see her for what she is, a part of the same crap we've been getting from D.C. for years. Fighting amongst themselves while we are left with the damage of a broken government. All the time they keep giving us the same vote for me and I’ll set you free speech, never giving us anything promised.

Barack will chart a new course in Washington just off his presence and the backing of the citizens and voters of this great nation. Such a bold agenda he will lay before us while challenging a generation to serve. If he is to succeed it must be by mandate or that new majority he talks about. I think that whatever our reason to support him we are all connected by the same mistrust and disgust we have toward those we voted for in the past.

In 08 we will not only send a message to lobbyist, special interest and oil companies but to our representatives; local, state and in DC telling them that there is a new way we are to conduct our nations business. No more bickering because we are weary, no more corporate welfare because we ourselves wonder if we are dipping into recession. We are shutting down the division that politicians have used against us for so long. That’s the change Barack has fought for and that’s why I support such a man to bring about so much needed change.

Re: True Change with Barack Obama | Report to Admin

By Carol-STL-MO Dec 28th 2007 at 1:02 am EST

Cilla,

Yes WE will... when WE elect Obama !!!!

Great speech | Report to Admin

By Athena Dec 27th 2007 at 6:59 pm EST

He just gets better and better.

Barack was correct again | Report to Admin

By lvampa Dec 27th 2007 at 7:00 pm EST

An old article from the WAPO where Hillary calls Barack naive for his stance on Pakistan.

He doesn't look naive today, but very very prescient.

Link

My First Post Here! | Report to Admin

By Beth Dec 27th 2007 at 7:01 pm EST

Many of us in Obama land are DEADLY SERIOUS about the direction of our country. It is time for all this silly MSM analysis to end and time for all the so-called Pundents to stop treating this Presidential campaign like a tabloid game show. Give me an in-depth analysis on Mr. Obama’s major foreign Policy speech. The same speech that, the Terror czar under Clinton and Bush, described as "the most comprehensive and sophisticated of any candidate from either party"--he added "this guy Obama gets it." The speech was powerful, and all the MSM folks could say is he wants to bomb Pakistan--pathetic. As long as they keep dummying down the Americans with this steady diet of nonsense. We will continue electing folks like the inarticulate person currently leading the Free World off the cliff. I only HOPE folks become informed. I think the MSM are not sure what to make of OBAMA, they are so use to dealing in mediocrity they don’t recognize true brilliance, talent and skills, and “off the hook” charisma--is an amazing soft skill highly regarded in the corporate world, recognized as an asset called Persuasion. And this candidate has it in abundance. Just think what the “power of persuasion” can do. He has run a very organized campaign--that has stayed on message, as good as the best in this race, what does that tell us about him. Remember he began his race with a 1,000 fund raising contacts. And look at what he has done raised more funds then any other Candidate. HRC, moved $!0 million form her Senate race, so it was not raised in the same “real time.” He has demonstrated that he is a class act with energy to burn, that he has good values, common sense, innovative ideas, well thought out policies, that he can articulate, and knows the constitution profoundly, he is a policy wonk, has a steady and calm demeanor He is the One!. He is ready, and I will be very sad if America is not ready for him. Let's Stand for Something Better! I am soooooooo sick of the mug slinging! Time to call on our better angels.

Re: My First Post Here! | Report to Admin

By Carol-STL-MO Dec 28th 2007 at 1:03 am EST

Beth,

Welcome & Thanks for posting

Obama Reaction to Bhutto Assassination | Report to Admin

By Terri Dec 27th 2007 at 7:04 pm EST

DES MOINES, IOWA -- Barack Obama reacted to the assassination of former Pakistani Prime Minister Benizir Bhutto this morning.

"It’s a tragic situation. My heart goes out to the families. But it’s an indication that we are in a dangerous world right now that we have to apply good judgment in our foreign policy," said Obama.

"We’ve been distracted by Iraq. We have not been paying attention to Pakistan for several years and as a consequence we have had a subversion of democracy at the same time we have ignored or at least not dealt with the growing threat of Islamic militants in Pakistan. If anything, Iraq has helped to spur some of the militancy in Pakistan. Now moving forward we have to send a message that we stand strong with the Pakistani people in moving the democratic process forward but we have to continue to press, to deal with this on going chaotic situation with the militants in Pakistan."

When asked how he would react to this situation if he were president today, Obama said, "I think it's too early for us to know exactly what the situation is. Obviously we have to figure out who will take responsibility for the assassination."

"I think one of the things that I would immediately do is to contact not only Musharraf but those in the military to determine how the security and the safety of nuclear weapons are being dealt with. That is something that obviously has to be the number one priority during a period where there may be instability and we have to make sure that that is being dealt with."

Link

To Lighten the Mood... | Report to Admin

By Bradley Dec 27th 2007 at 7:06 pm EST

Found this awesome stuff on SI.com. Here's a couple pics of Obama getting busy on the court!

Link

Enjoy! Let this remind us that Obama is a person, not just a politician! And nothing was killed/harmed in the making (if you get my jab at Huckabee's pheasant hunting video).

Why Barack is more needed now then ever. | Report to Admin

By fran Dec 27th 2007 at 7:07 pm EST

The assassination of Bhutto underscores why Barack is the right choice for America. What the pundits don't realize is that the world doesn't need saber rattlers or isolationists or supposed experienced leaders who reach for the military as their first and only response. What the world needs now is someone with the diversity of background and life expereinces to understand intuitively that violence or military threats are not the appropriate responses to the new types of threats we face at home and abroad. An understanding of the struggles on the ground in the everyday lives of those who feel invisible is where the solutions to the struggles will be found. The power is in the details and only someone whose background includes a heritage grounded in the third world sensibilities and sensitivities will help guide an American response that is one of healing and helping not hurting and divisive oppression sustained thru violence. Having grown up in the largest Muslim country in the world will allow those on both sides of the Pakistani struggle to see in President Obama a kindred spirit who hears what they are trying to say to each other and to the world. No one else can re-brand america to the world at war with terror. The pundits view the conflict thru the only prisms they know. This is the same way they originally viewed Obama's candidacy and couldn't understand why he wasn't going for the jugular and anything short of that was a failure. These are different times and they need to think outside the box because that is where the rest of the world lives.

The 90's. | Report to Admin

By lvampa Dec 27th 2007 at 7:07 pm EST

NBC News has obtained, exclusively, extraordinary secret video, shot by the U.S. government. It illustrates an enormous opportunity the Clinton administration had to kill or capture bin Laden. Critics call it a missed opportunity.

Link

Re: The 90's. | Report to Admin

By Nancy Drew Dec 27th 2007 at 7:42 pm EST

You should send that link to HQ or wherever one sends info.

Re: The 90's. | Report to Admin

By Tammy Dec 27th 2007 at 7:59 pm EST

Barath may want to add that to his list of points and counter points in case the Bhutto story is still hanging around come caucus.

Re: The 90's. | Report to Admin

By Theresa LV Dec 27th 2007 at 9:20 pm EST

I hope his really does come out on all the stations. I've read about B Clinton NOT going after bin Laden after his attacks on the US but nothing ever came out big time in the news.

Could this be some of what the infamous Sandy Berger stole before the 911 commission could review it? And now he is rewarded with a spot on the Hillary campaign and who knows what was promised if she wins the election.

Do we want these people back in the whitehouse? A group of thugs?

Re: The 90's. | Report to Admin

By Kristian "I Ain't Afraid of No GOPs" Idol Dec 28th 2007 at 3:22 am EST

Sorry, guys, the date on this article is March 17th, 2004.

LA Times Poll | Report to Admin

By Mason City 4 Obama Dec 27th 2007 at 7:08 pm EST

Link

Good news out of NH. I don't know what to make out of the Iowa "likely caucus goers" figure.

NEW POLLS | Report to Admin

By ♫ ❀ ✿ ♪ MsCiara, in Paris ♪ ❀ ✿ ♫ Dec 27th 2007 at 7:11 pm EST

GREAT

Link

WASHINGTON -- Barack Obama has wiped out Hillary Clinton's once-commanding lead in New Hampshire and the two remain virtually tied in Iowa, a new Los Angeles Times/Bloomberg News poll has found, as more and more voters get off the fence and decide whom to support.

Obama drew backing from 32% of New Hampshire Democratic primary voters to Clinton's 30% -- a dramatic shift from September, when a similar poll found him trailing 35% to 16% in the state, which will hold its presidential primary Jan. 8.

In Iowa, which opens the 2008 presidential voting with its Jan. 3 caucuses, the poll found that Obama and Clinton remain in a three-way dead heat with former Sen. John Edwards.

But other poll findings suggest Clinton might gain stature in both states if Democrats' concern about world affairs increases in the wake of the assassination of former Pakistan Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto. The poll shows that Democrats in both Iowa and New Hampshire -- as they do elsewhere around the country -- consider Clinton far-better equipped than her rivals to safeguard national security.

Such a shift in focus away from domestic policy could also affect the Republican presidential contest and benefit Sen. John McCain, whose campaign has rebounded in New Hampshire to put him in second place behind front-runner Mitt Romney, the former governor of Massachusetts.

The poll found that Republicans in New Hampshire and Iowa consider McCain best qualified to handle foreign affairs, though his campaign has suffered from months of weak fundraising and staff turmoil.

In Iowa, the poll found that the Republican race has been scrambled by the steep rise of former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee, the conservative Baptist minister who has opened a lead of 37% to 23% over Romney. For months, Romney had enjoyed a solid lead.

The poll underscores how, in both parties, the two earliest-voting states are ripe for surprises and upsets in the final days of the campaign.

"Things can go a little crazy up here in New Hampshire," said Tom Mathauser, a poll respondent who supports Obama, referring to the state's history of supporting dark horse candidates like Paul Tsongas in 1992 and McCain in 2000. "This is the kind of thing that can blow up in someone's face."

Re: NEW POLLS | Report to Admin

By Theresa LV Dec 27th 2007 at 9:25 pm EST

My question

Why is H Clinton viewed as more credible in the face of international crises? She has shown through her voting record that she is not equipped to handle any critical situation.

She couldn't take the time to read the NIE report that would have cast light on the lies Bush was spreading. It guess she felt that a vote for invading Iraq and our soldiers dying was better for her run for president.

How can her polls be anything but in the toilet after her poor judgement? That is my question.

Re: NEW POLLS | Report to Admin

By Andrew Lietzow Dec 27th 2007 at 9:28 pm EST

OMG -- RE:>>"The poll shows that Democrats in both Iowa and New Hampshire -- as they do elsewhere around the country - consider Clinton far-better equipped than her rivals to safeguard national security".
-------
Surely you jest! Hillary Rodham Clinton is best qualified to be Sec'y of Education, not President. That someone would lump me in with that group of Democrats who think that she is actually better qualified to be President than Barack, or even JE, or JB. This is ludicrous.

Do these same Democrats not remember how Condoleeza Rice was recently rebuffed by a Turkey foreign minister, and Valdimir Putin?

We in America may respect a woman, and treat her as an equal, but we are in the minority in the world. Our biggest threats are from the Middle east, and Islamic fundamentalists who believe woman are somehow inferior. How will they respect us, the United States, if they don't respect our leader?

For people to allude that somehow HRC has more credentials than Barack, to lead our country and be a strong Commander-in-Chief, is to ignore the facts. America cannot afford to roll the dice with Hillary, even with Bill behind her.

Re: LA Times Poll | Report to Admin

By Tammy Dec 27th 2007 at 8:01 pm EST

I think President Obama will keep it going. He may even jump in and comment here and there. Wouldn't that be great?

Re: LA Times Poll | Report to Admin

By J. Lowe Dec 27th 2007 at 8:30 pm EST

i think we'd be busy working to create the country that we hold near and dear to our hearts. When Obama honors his promise to give democracy back to the people, we have the responsibility to care for it.

i look forward to doing steps 2 and 3 of the My Policy system (click on Issues / blue box), so i can learn where we are all at and where we can go from here.

after the election, i look forward to reading proposed legislation online (click on issues / cleaning up washington for the policy proposal that states this), so that i can learn what is going on down there, and see exactly what my representative is voting on.

Re: LA Times Poll | Report to Admin

By Carol-STL-MO Dec 28th 2007 at 1:07 am EST

J Lowe,

Thanks for posting

New Polls | Report to Admin

By Kwame Dec 27th 2007 at 7:13 pm EST

In Iowa, Clinton is backed by 29% of Democratic voters, compared with 26% for Obama and 25% for Edwards -- negligible differences because they are within the poll's margin of error.

Obama drew backing from 32% of New Hampshire Democratic primary voters to Clinton's 30%

Link

Re: New Polls | Report to Admin

By Cilla...Currently living in Spain and lovin' it Dec 27th 2007 at 7:18 pm EST

Yes,

And just as soon as we get happy about that polling, tomorrow will show the MSM having a poll saying Obama down by 10-15 points, then once again there will be PANIC on this blog.

Re: New Polls | Report to Admin

By Mason City 4 Obama Dec 27th 2007 at 7:20 pm EST

I'm concerned with the last part of the article, in Iowa "31% of likely caucus-goers support Clinton, while Obama's support drops to 22%. Edwards' support was unchanged."

This certainly underscores the importance of getting our supporters to the caucus sites Thursday.

Re: New Polls | Report to Admin

By Dutch in Georgia Dec 27th 2007 at 7:23 pm EST

Mason-

What is the feel amongst supporters of Biden and Richardson?

Is there now a coordinated effort to reach out to them?

Hit me back.

And yes, we must MAKE SURE all Obama supporters caucus.

No excuses, save a death or something.

Re: New Polls | Report to Admin

By Mason City 4 Obama Dec 27th 2007 at 7:32 pm EST

The few people I know supporting the second tier are likely not going to caucus. The comments are "why waste an hour and a half (attending caucus) only to settle for a second choice."

There has been an attempt to reach out to be the second choice among voters -- the Senator now mentions it in his stump speech.

Re: New Polls | Report to Admin

By Athena Dec 27th 2007 at 7:30 pm EST

As long as the pollsters keep comparing HRC and Barack via Democratic voters only, they will, IMO, not get an accurate portrait. Obama has the backing of many independents and republicans, as well all know.

As for Bhutto: who knows. The pundits are certainly doing their best to predict that the politics of fear will outweigh people's desire for change.

BUT, here is an article that appeared on ABC's website in which David Axelrod address this very issue. He did REALLY WELL. It is a must read:

Link

Re: New Polls | Report to Admin

By 08AMA! Dec 27th 2007 at 7:36 pm EST

yeah it does underscore that fact.

However keep in mind that those polls are only 600 ppl, and that support varies depending on who gets calls. And ARG and CNN polls have been bought out by Clinton so their numbers are grossly inflated. Please, ARG shows Obama down 15 while most show him up 4+? That says something. Obama still has the momentum and the advantage in Iowa.

Re: New Polls | Report to Admin

By Carol-STL-MO Dec 28th 2007 at 1:11 am EST

I'm only concerned about still being alive & breathing on Jan 3rd I can celebrate Obama's victory !!!

Re: New Polls | Report to Admin

By Kristian "I Ain't Afraid of No GOPs" Idol Dec 28th 2007 at 3:28 am EST

I'm waiting to exhale...

Re: Cilla give us a break | Report to Admin

By Dutch in Georgia Dec 27th 2007 at 7:21 pm EST

Hon, we are not panicking.

It is deadlocked in Iowa. Absolute tie. Now, it is all about the ground game, reaching out to Richardson/Biden supporters, Independents, Republicans, etc.

We are just nervous. I am making my calls, even trying to call Richardson people to BEG them to not support the Establishment candidates.

We are just nervous.

Re: New Polls | Report to Admin

By Terri Dec 27th 2007 at 7:41 pm EST

lol ! Well, we've pretty much ignored it before, we'll do it again.

Once more and with feeling...

The only polls that matter are on election/caucus night. Repeat after me ....

Re: New Polls | Report to Admin

By Tammy Dec 27th 2007 at 8:02 pm EST

And you know with seven days left they'll probably try to do seven more polls.

TRUST FAITH TRUTH | Report to Admin

By Theresa in Maine Dec 27th 2007 at 7:14 pm EST

Due to the fact that the majority of Congressmen and Senators gave Bush the authority to invade Iraq, there have been tens of thousands of killings and serious injuried in Iraq and there will tragically be many more. Today was another horrendous reminder of the lunacy of murder.

I must TRUST that the people of Iowa and NH have the wisdom to select a candidate who was against the worst mistake America has made since Viet Nam.

I must have FAITH in them because there isn't anything more I can do at this point but blog and pray.

Sending this video out to all contacts | Report to Admin

By YesWeCan Carol Dec 27th 2007 at 7:20 pm EST

Thank you Barack, for keeping our priorities as your priorities. I'm sending out this video to all on my contact list.

Lets unite and not have fear | Report to Admin

By Luis Dec 27th 2007 at 7:24 pm EST

Now more than ever,we have to be united,optimistic,not fearful of what the media says,but lets continue to support Barack the same way we did yesterday before the Pakistan event occured.

Ahora mas que nunca estemos optimistas,unidos y sin miedo por lo que los medios dicen.Vamos a seguir respaldando a Barack con el mismo entusiasmo que fue ayer antes del atentado en Pakistan.

OBAMA 08

How to proceed? | Report to Admin

By Athena Dec 27th 2007 at 7:23 pm EST

There is much being said here about what attitude we should be taking only seven days before the Iowa caucuses.

There is fear, optimism, panic, great hope, and, all the time, we ask ourselves which of those and other emotions are the most realistic or compelling to our souls.

Strangely, the answer on how to fare as time closes in upon is to NOT practice what we preach.

That is: work like dogs; labor as though Barack were 30 points behind in Iowa; take no vote, no donation, no speech and no rally for granted.

But in your mind, think like winners. It is hard not to dread Iowa - it is hard to look forward to it. We have seen how other candidates' hubris can portend their downfall.

And yet, consider how not practicing what you preach can, in this case, be complementary, rather than contradictory.

Champions work their hearts out. Champions sacrifice everything. They are confident by nature, but they train as though they were the worst in the race. Champions derive their strength not just from hope but also from great sacrifice and strength of spirit and perseverence.

They have fears they must overcome and great uncertainty, but eventually their titanic inner strength carries them through.

And that is how we must try to think and act in these last days. With all the mixture of emotion, expectation and training that paint the portrait of a champion.

Judgment, not experience! | Report to Admin

By Luevonia "Hussein" Williams Dec 27th 2007 at 7:27 pm EST

I have been listening to some of the talking heads (pundits) on CNN and CSNBC talking about how now experience matters more than change, and how that will help Hillary Clinton (on the Democratic side) and John McCain (on the Republican side), instead of change candidates like Barack Obama, John Edwards, and Mike Huckabee. But, what I think they are missing is that Barack said back in 2002 that this War in Iraq would take our focus off of the countries that we should be paying attention to, such as Afghanistan and Pakistan. And, now a Pakistani leader is dead. I think that because of things like this, American voters should be looking for leaders who exercise good judgment when it counts and vision to help heal this region of the world and the world as a whole. Barack Obama (and to a lesser extent, John Edwards) is that leader.

I think that the way that long-time Washington politicians remain in Washington, is to take advantage of the American people's fear during crises such as 9/11 and what happened today in Pakistan in order to get votes from the voters, by saying that we need someone in the Presidency that has a lot of so-called overseas experience. That is why we have these people in there that have been in Washington for 20, 30, and 40 years. But, if we want real change, then we must realize (without fear) that in order to get that change, we must have people in Washington and yes, even the Presidency that have not been in Washington all that long. How else are we to get the change that this country, and indeed the world, that we need?

Re: Judgment, not experience! | Report to Admin

By HS from Seattle Dec 27th 2007 at 7:29 pm EST

New thread. Barack Obama on Larry King Live.

Re: Judgment, not experience! | Report to Admin

By JQ Dec 27th 2007 at 7:39 pm EST

He gave a speech a couple of months ago on how we should getting out troops from Iraq and focus on Afghanistan and Pakistan. Remember Hillary and Dodd gave him hell for saying that in on of the debates.

Obama was right again. He needs to get his team on the news shows tomorrow to remind people of that.

Re: Judgment, not experience! | Report to Admin

By John Hussein Tchen Dec 27th 2007 at 7:41 pm EST

Like Barack said, this is the right type of experience and the wrong type of experience. IMO, she has the latter as she has been consistently wrong on foreign affairs:

1) Voted for the Iraq war (wrong judgment).
2) Voted to give Bush the green light to declare war on Iran (wrong judgment).
3) She didn't think the situation in Pakistan was the most pressing and dangerous situation. (wrong judgment)

In contrast, Barack was right on all the above issues. Now you tell me who is most qualified to be the next commander-in-chief?

President Obama 2008!

Re: Judgment, not experience! | Report to Admin

By waterprise2 Dec 27th 2007 at 7:47 pm EST

I agree! I agree!! Let's all take a breath and get back to our confidence in our guy and our "family" and our greatest strength--our knowledge that Barack was right all along!

"Experience": Governor Romney was so intent on being the "first" to rattle his sabers with his comments this morning that he "forgot" to even offer his condolences! He had to make a second statement to correct his first!

"Experience": Governor Richardson said that the US should demand that Mushareff (sp) step down immediately! Demand? America with its diminished standing in the world? Step Down? Then what? Then who? Do we even know if Musharref was responsible?

Judgment: Senator Obama knowing and showing and speaking up with vision and prescience and courage and strength. He was right.

Let's let the #1 Organizations in Iowa and New Hampshire do their jobs and Senator Obama will win Iowa and New Hampshire, and then the nomination and then the general election!

Fired Up!
Ready to Go!
Obama '08!

Re: Judgment, not experience! | Report to Admin

By Saybah Dec 27th 2007 at 7:59 pm EST

You are right. Barack has some of the best foreign policy advisers. This woman's body is barely cold, and you have the pundits declaring the election and who it is benefiting.

Everyone barked at Barack when he discussed Pakistan earlier this year. The response from the woman killed today was not hostile to Barack regarding that comment, in fact, she seem to somewhat agree with him.

I just finished reading a comment at Andrew Sullivan's site. Someone commenting on the woman's death said something to the fact that, no doubt it will impact the political landscape in Pakistan, but today, the person said, they were mourning the death of the dead woman, more importantly respecting the feelings of the dead woman.

All of a sudden today, listen to certain politicians, they all knew Ms. Buttho.

You can rest assured Barack will discuss the issue tomorrow.

Re: Judgment, not experience! | Report to Admin

By J. Lowe Dec 27th 2007 at 8:28 pm EST

There have been several respected articles posted here that have consistently shown that experience is not as important as change in the minds of the voter.

CNN: Creating the Nightly News

Re: Judgment, not experience! | Report to Admin

By Rory Dec 27th 2007 at 9:08 pm EST

Yes, I have been watching cable news all day and they are simply repeating the same false naritive, that the terrible assassination of Bhutto will strengthen Hillary because it shows we live in a dangerous world and we need a experienced and tested leader. Putting aside the dubious quality of Hillary's own experience, I think this is a situation where we must highlight Sen. Obama's judgment and courage to make the right decision even when it is politically unpopular. No one in Washington had more 'experience' than Chaney and Rumsfeld, yet they still led America into fiasco of Iraq. With one week left until the caucus Sen Obama must not shy away from National Security issues. He has a great case of judgment of experience and he should press it. We all must help stop the media group think and get Sen. Obama's message out!

New thread | Report to Admin

By meta Dec 27th 2007 at 7:29 pm EST

Yikes! New thread with some news.

Re: New thread | Report to Admin

By ayak Hussein va Dec 27th 2007 at 7:47 pm EST

barrack needs to be talking to the press right now
to share his vision about foreign policy especially with the assassination of bhuto;
john edwards is on now sounding like obama , borrowing from obama s speeches in previous debates; where is obama

Re: aruba4obama | Report to Admin

By Unknown user Dec 27th 2007 at 8:41 pm EST

I was born in the sixties (1966)the decade of JFK,RFK and MLK.I was too young to witness their legacy but their wisdom had crossed over the american border,across the ocean like a tiny ripple of hope and reach a small island on this planet called Aruba.I read all their books,bought all their dvd's and never thought in my lifetime to witness such world leaders till the democratic convention in 2004.It was Barack Obama who caught my atention and I identify him as a world leader immediately.
I thank now the internet so I can follow each and every day this movement and I'm sure Barack Obama will be the next president of the United States of America and the new world leader.
There's hope not only for America but for the world.Iowa the decision is yours.

Re: aruba4obama | Report to Admin

By Luevonia "Hussein" Williams Dec 27th 2007 at 8:54 pm EST

I was also born in 1966 (December 22)!

Smile!

Re: aruba4obama | Report to Admin

By Unknown user Dec 27th 2007 at 10:20 pm EST

nice to hear from generation of 1966
fire up ready to go for obama

this is our generation,we can make history
Just watched obama on CNN larry King,actually Mr wolff Blitzer and he did e great job.
He's right again on Pakistan where there should be more atention there to fight terrorism.

Re: My First Post Here! | Report to Admin

By Tammy Dec 27th 2007 at 7:57 pm EST

When Matthews talks that way you wonder to yourself about his intelligence. He sounds like an idiot.

Matthews even said that because Bhutto was a woman and Hillary is a woman people may decide to vote for Hillary.

When you figure out the logic let me know.

Re: My First Post Here! | Report to Admin

By JonnieRae Dec 27th 2007 at 11:03 pm EST

They absolutely shouldn't be talking about how the assassination of this brave woman is going to affect the campaign in Iowa. That's what is wrong with MSM and Washington. They have no idea how to show respect, not only for the victim(s) but for the American people's intelligence. Also, this is a crisis for Pakistan. We should be getting news reports giving us factual background, not only about Bhutto, but about Pakistan, a country most know very little about. This is an opportunity to educate us. It is totally acceptable to connect her death to the campaign in Iowa.

Re: My First Post Here! | Report to Admin

By JonnieRae Dec 27th 2007 at 11:06 pm EST

I meant "unacceptable." I saw Barack on Larry King Live tonight. He was great, defending Axelrod and proposing a makes - sense idea: convening a meeting of all Muslim leaders in the region. Also, he said the most important thing was to be sure nuclear weapons secured. He said he called Musharif to make sure they were and received an affirmative response. He really backed Wolf Blitzer down.

Re: New Polls | Report to Admin

By Carol-STL-MO Dec 28th 2007 at 1:13 am EST

Folks just stop talking & keep doing...things will work out !!!!

What next? | Report to Admin

By ☞Aunt Becky☜ ... Blogyenta: "I kvetch, therefore I am." Dec 27th 2007 at 7:47 pm EST

GET A GRIP, kids!

I TOLD you it was going to be a bumpy ride. Have I ever lied to you?

Well, my dears, we're on an ever-expanding rollercoaster. It's gonna get a WHOLE lot worse. It's HURRICANE season, kids. No time for the faint of heart.

Get a grip. Get grounded. Now have a cookie.

It's all unfolding just the way it should. Trust me.

Lose the hysteria, kids. Take a deep breath, step back, and ENJOY it, fer godsakes! LOL

We will not pass this way again.

Love, hugs, and more cookies...
Auntie B.

barack going to change it all | Report to Admin

By Tom Water Gives Clean Hydrogen Dec 27th 2007 at 8:00 pm EST

I want him to change the banking system too. go watch america freedom to facism on youtube. and i hop barack will change the fed reserve system of monetary policy. i want my dollar to be worth something in the future.

and how much can you donate? i see people donating 9600 i thought the limit was 2300? and i see companies donating 300,000 there is not limit for a company??

i hope he changes this donation stuff as its just all a bribe, i dont like it.

and remember make hydrogen from water and run your cars on water, stop pollution now. double your gas mileage everyone get a hydrogen injection system in your car. see http://safefuel.ca

i hope barack uses the peoples ideas to change the country and not keep us out of it again as people do right now. we all have phones, lets vote using the phone on everything we care about.

Re: barack going to change it all | Report to Admin

By Tammy Dec 27th 2007 at 8:05 pm EST

Don't worry Tom. I think we really have a man of his word in Obama.

Re: What next? | Report to Admin

By Michael from EriePA Dec 27th 2007 at 8:22 pm EST

We are in it for the long haul. We have the right candidate for this trip. There is a lot more hard work to do. There are more people that we need to make sure get the message that change and hope are not only possible, they are necessary. "The fierce urgency of now" needs to be harnessed and kept in the forefront of our efforts. We have an opportunity to change the direction of this great nation and make sure that change is enduring. All of this takes hard work and patience on one hand, but on the other we need to make sure the message is heard. Make a difference in what you do today....

Re: What next? | Report to Admin

By ayak Hussein va Dec 27th 2007 at 8:35 pm EST

it turns out obama was right about pakistan after all ; just like he said during the debate , we took our eyes off the ball , we should have been in akistan fighting the real terrorists instead we landed in iraq thanks to hillary and bush;
their experience is incomptent and dangerous and we do not need it anymore.
thanks to bush and hillary s war in iraq the terroists are still out there in pakistan and afghanistan ; iraq was never about the war on terror ; it was made to be by hillary and bush ; the real war on terror has not been engaged yet in pakistan
obama 08

300,000,000 for Obama | Report to Admin

By CJ Dec 27th 2007 at 8:00 pm EST

I will share with you a quote from the movie 300 to give courage to all who are worried about the special interest and lobbyist attempting to drag our movement down.

Leonidas: The world will know that free men stood against the Clinton machine, that few stood against many, and before this battle was over, that even the special interest kings can loose.

Now are you fired up!!!! If you are then chant this blog with me my friends. Fired up, Ready to go!!!

Re: 300,000,000 for Obama | Report to Admin

By Michael from EriePA Dec 27th 2007 at 8:29 pm EST

Fired up and ready to go! Stand up for change! Hope. Healing. Unity. The power is in the hands of the people and we are the people. Democracy still lives in America. "Let's go change the world."

Re: 300,000,000 for Obama | Report to Admin

By ayak Hussein va Dec 27th 2007 at 8:46 pm EST

it turns out obama was right about pakistan after all ; just like he said during the debate , we took our eyes off the ball , we should have been in akistan fighting the real terrorists instead we landed in iraq thanks to hillary and bush;
their experience is incomptent and dangerous and we do not need it anymore.
thanks to bush and hillary s war in iraq the terroists are still out there in pakistan and afghanistan ; iraq was never about the war on terror ; it was made to be by hillary and bush ; the real war on terror has not been engaged yet in pakistan.
however obama should be out there in the media
giving the same talk he gave about pakistan in the earlier debates (where hillary thought it was naive) he really should capitalize on his previous debate statements about pakistan;
now he is letting hillary and john edwards out there steal his policies about pakistan when
they called him naive ; now who is naive now??
my only issue with obama is he needs to be ou there telling the media <<>>> when you called me naive.
it seems now the real naive is the media and hillary ; but the voters dont know that ; obama needs to make this known to the media. let it be known that the media and hillary called him naive when he explained his foreign policy philososphy
regarding pakistan and the real war on terror ;
man I am so mad that he has n done this ; this could be the turning point of this election.
I hate it when hillary gets credit or takes credit for things she didn say ; she is know out there repeating obama s policies on pakistan which she called naive earlier in the previous debates. god I am so mad

Re: Pat Buchannan | Report to Admin

By Luevonia "Hussein" Williams Dec 27th 2007 at 8:49 pm EST

Pat Buchannan (and as a matter of fact, Chris Matthews, too), were on Hardball talking about how Barack has just as much (if not more) of a chance to win Iowa as Hillary Clinton. Now, all of a sudden, with the events of today, somehow now Hillary has the best chance to win, because of her experience??? If Iowa voters are that weak as to trade in a candidate that they were strongly for yesterday who offered hope, vision, and good judgment (Barack), for a candidate that keeps claiming only one thing, that she is more experienced (Hillary), then they are ninkapoops. But, I don't think that Obama supporters or undecideds that were leaning toward Barack just yesterday, will all of a sudden go with Hillary out of some kind of fear that we supposedly need someone in the White House with more foreign policy experience. We don't need that! What we need is someone with good judgment, like Barack Obama. I think that Iowans will opt for someone who has demonstated good sound judgment when it wasn't popular to someone who supposedly has a lot of overseas, foriegn policy experience. I don't buy that Hillary has more of that kind of experience anyway. Nor do I think that Iowans will buy into her crap!!!

No worries Iowa! | Report to Admin

By Stacy Dec 27th 2007 at 8:45 pm EST

You are not alone. We are phonebanking like crazy for you here in Idaho. I called Iowans all over the state this afternoon (mostly Hansen's and Hanson's...I guess I had the H's!) and 2/3rds of them were strong or leaning Obama supporters who also planned on caucusing! And let's not forget about all of the students who are heavily under-represented in the polls. They are coming back to Iowa in droves to caucus for the Senator...our youth will not let you down! Obama supporters nationwide are behind you and we know YOU CAN DO IT Iowa! Take all of the energy that anxiety creates, and talk to your neighbors, make calls, and live and breathe Obama for one more week! We admire your stamina and commitment and thank you for all of your efforts.

Re: No worries Iowa! | Report to Admin

By ayak Hussein va Dec 27th 2007 at 8:50 pm EST

it turns out obama was right about pakistan after all ; just like he said during the debate , we took our eyes off the ball , we should have been in akistan fighting the real terrorists instead we landed in iraq thanks to hillary and bush;
their experience is incomptent and dangerous and we do not need it anymore.
thanks to bush and hillary s war in iraq the terroists are still out there in pakistan and afghanistan ; iraq was never about the war on terror ; it was made to be by hillary and bush ; the real war on terror has not been engaged yet in pakistan.
however obama should be out there in the media
giving the same talk he gave about pakistan in the earlier debates (where hillary thought it was naive) he really should capitalize on his previous debate statements about pakistan;
now he is letting hillary and john edwards out there steal his policies about pakistan when
they called him naive ; now who is naive now??
my only issue with obama is he needs to be out there telling the media <<how she called him naive>>> when you called me naive.
it seems now the real naive is the media and hillary ; but the voters dont know that ; obama needs to make this known to the media. let it be known that the media and hillary called him naive when he explained his foreign policy philososphy
regarding pakistan and the real war on terror ;
man I am so mad that he has n done this ; this could be the turning point of this election.
I hate it when hillary gets credit or takes credit for things she didn say ; she is now out there repeating obama s policies on pakistan which she called naive earlier in the previous debates. god I am so mad

response to CNN 's lies about what alex rod said | Report to Admin

By ayak Hussein va Dec 27th 2007 at 9:22 pm EST

once again CNN lies and misleads readers in favor of clinton; regardless of how far you spin and stretch the truth you can not force hillary down our throats; you have continuously during the course of this campaign stretched the truth in favor of hillary ; CNN you have spinned in favor of hillary ; now you are spinning what alex rod said just to get her elected ; well I have news for you CNN ; she wont get elected not this time ; she will lose shamefully in IOWA and your network will be stunned ; you are in for a big surprise CNN ; you are supporting a loser; the american people connected with obama ; they understood his message; regardless of how you spin you will lose CNN ; just like you(CNN and hillary) stretched the truth about the war in iraq calling war on terror , you will lose CNN.
obama had the right judgement when in previous debate mentionned we should have been focused in pakistan, instead hillary and bush and CNN decided to create a war on terror in iraq ; I have news for you CNN ; the real war on terror is in afghanistan just like obama said but you would n happen to report on that because you CNN and hillary called that naive remember ???? so who is naive now.

I thought you news people (CNN) take an oath to report the truth but instead
you have always stretched the truth ; where is your jouranlism ethics CNN ???
you have no ethics whatsoever

Re: No worries Iowa! | Report to Admin

By IA for Obama ☮ Dec 27th 2007 at 9:01 pm EST

Thank you, Stacy!

How is Idaho looking!!! | Report to Admin

By Jeff from Idaho Dec 28th 2007 at 11:14 am EST

Hello Stacy,
I'm up here in North Idaho, just wondering how things are going down there. Good job supporting Obama!!

AFRICAN AMERICAN NEED TO THINK DEEPLY | Report to Admin

By SB Dec 27th 2007 at 10:23 pm EST

There is a concerted effort by Hillary Staff, Bill Clinton to make us as black people feel like they did all these great things for us, so we should vote for them.

As an african american, I am not obliged to vote for anyone unless I chose to do so. What has bill and hill done for us since they have been in washington, running the democratic party together domestically and internationally. Urban areas thoughout the usa has not improved, black people are still being told to wait when they really want to make a change and uplift there standard of living.

Africa is being destroyed at an alarming rate. I also need to say that bill is no first black president; thats some brainwash being shun on us to believe the foolishness that we have faced for so many years in history.

And last but not least, I think bill was disrespectful on charlie rose show about obama is a risk if we vote for him. I think Al sharpton should have come out and call out bill clinton on his statement and make him apologise: you guys need to understand that there is a double standard as far as race is concern. There are racist people in the democratic party as well as the republicans.

It is unfairly charged that only republicans are racist; if a republican had told obama that he is a risk, then people like Al sharpton would have come out and attack. Read between the lines ladies and gentlemen. good evening!

Re: AFRICAN AMERICAN NEED TO THINK DEEPLY | Report to Admin

By Tony H. Dec 28th 2007 at 10:59 am EST

It's time some of us wake up and face the harsh Clinton reality that has plagued the African American Community. I didn't trust Bill and don't trust Hill.

Obama is the ONE!

Re: AFRICAN AMERICAN NEED TO THINK DEEPLY | Report to Admin

By Gerarda in Oklahoma Dec 28th 2007 at 1:28 pm EST

Amen, Brother! You said it better than I can. I am a 63 year old white woman. I have been saying to my family and friends all year long, throughout this campaign: What did Bill Clinton do for Black People? What did Hillary do for Black People? I don't remember anything.

Each time I ask, I also say: Just name ONE thing the Clintons did for Black People. You know what: They cannot name one thing.

The Clintons are supposedly for equal opportunity, equal education, equal living conditions, etc. for Black People. But look: Here are the Clintons trying to drive Americans AGAINST Obama, the first viable Black Presidential Candidate. They're trying to destroy him. You would think, having been in the White House (and the Arkansas Governor's Mansion) for a total of 18 years, that the Clintons would be willing to step aside to see the first Black person become Commander in Chief of this country. (And I am one of those voters who put Bill Clinton in office twice.) They are not supportive of electing our first Black President, because they are too greedy. With the Clintons, it's not about elevating people of color, it's not about equal rights, it's not about the needs and issues of the citizens of this country. It's ONLY about the Clintons' greed, power and selfishness.

There, I said it publicly. CASE CLOSED!

CAMBODIAN BEER FOR BARACK | Report to Admin

By Eric from Cambodia Dec 27th 2007 at 11:35 pm EST

6 DAYS, 19 HOURS, 55 MINUTES!!!
Anyone willing to match my beers?

A CAMBODIAN BEER FOR BARACK Link

Go Obama! | Report to Admin

By Kenyatta "Hussain" Dec 28th 2007 at 1:21 am EST

Obama was on Larry King tonight, and Wolf Blitzer was salivating at the mouth, trying to get Obama's back up against the wall, over the comment Axelrod said...Well folks, OBAMA was EXCELLENT and was not having it, he put Wolf in his place and it was obvious to me that Wolf knew he wasn't getting his big story for tomorrow...Shame on CNN, the worst tabloid station on television. But Kudos to OBAMA!

WOW | Report to Admin

By Kurt Dec 28th 2007 at 2:43 am EST

Great speech. One of the great speakers of our time. And with the intelligence to back it up.

Take That! | Report to Admin

By Michael Guinn Dec 28th 2007 at 3:29 am EST

Got an Email from a friend in Idaho who backs Barack and is worried about the latest poll.Told him not to worry! This speech says it all so well. It's crunch time and the Establishment is SCARED of CHANGE!
We have the Candidate for Change and the Politics of HOPE are still doing well dispite the opposition's tactics!
WE ARE GONNA WIN THIS THING!
OBAMA 08!

Great Writing | Report to Admin

By Nicholas from Hilton, NY Dec 28th 2007 at 8:32 am EST

Kudos to the writer on this one. Our next President could be a bit punchier on delivery though. It's a better read than on video. Can't tell you though how great it makes me feel to know that great rhetoric is still alive.

Re: Great Writing | Report to Admin

By Lawrence Dec 28th 2007 at 9:30 am EST (Updated Dec 28th 2007 at 10:47 am EST)

This comment has been removed due to objectionable or disrespectful content.

And that is why I believe... | Report to Admin

By Tony Loyd Dec 28th 2007 at 10:25 am EST

Call me an idealist, but I believe. I believe that Barack Obama will win this election - that he will restore the Constitutional rule of law - that he will close Guantanamo - that he will heal America. I believe.

The time for Obama is now | Report to Admin

By Steven R Dec 28th 2007 at 12:16 pm EST

I love this speech and the tone he has taken with this campaign. And I'm happy to declare myself a new Obama Supporter. I hope this speech gets full airtime in Iowa on election night after we win!

Good for you, Obama! | Report to Admin

By Gerarda in Oklahoma Dec 28th 2007 at 1:14 pm EST

Way to go, Obama. You are a President.

The cynics are working around the clock, quoting polls that are not correct, touting strength that Hillary actually DOES NOT HAVE. Don't listen to them. It's all propaganda. Obama will win Iowa, and go on to capture New Hampshire and South Carolina. Chris Matthews knows this, and he can't wait to see Obama win.

I am praying for victory. Go, Obama, Go!

I would like to be American. | Report to Admin

By Simone Campa Dec 28th 2007 at 5:32 pm EST

I am Italian and would like to be American just to vote for Barak
Obama.
I cry when listen to his speeches.
Please American people,
PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE YOUNG AMERICAN PEOPLE help us, young people like
you on this other side of the ocean, to see that a different reality is
possible. You have the power, be courageous, vote for Barak Obama, the
president not just of the Democrats, but of ALL the American people.
Thank-you.
Simone Campanelli from Italy

Re: I would like to be American. | Report to Admin

By CHIDI Dec 28th 2007 at 6:06 pm EST

You feel the same way I feel and I wish we all can come together to change the world with Obama.

OBAMA'S DREAM | Report to Admin

By CHIDI Dec 28th 2007 at 6:04 pm EST

I'm proud to be an Obama supporter because his honesty and sincere dream transends self and high ambition to re-write history like the Clintons.When I listen to him, I feel touched to the marrows and I see the dream he has for poterity.That dream is for all of us and our children-children....I wish him luck and I'll play any role to see him elected as President of the 21st century.He is what the world and America needs right now .

Obama is not just a presidential candidate | Report to Admin

By Thomas from Tampa, FL Dec 28th 2007 at 6:37 pm EST

Obama is more of a spititial and national healer, who just happens to have great political sense and savvy. Rarely have I seen anyone like him in politics. I am a life long CNN,MSNBC and yes FOX junckie. Politics is like a sport to me and Obama is the Michael Jordan or Tiger Woods of our political era. Given the chance, which he has so rightfully earned, he can transend this nation the way Tiger Woods has done in golf. And, as Americans we love to win and every one loves a winner. Don't let this Tiger lose, go out and vote for the best person.. If you were picking a team wouldn't you take the best person first. The Mr. Obamas of the world are hard to find and rare. We Americans have got one such leader on Team America,lets put him in best position to use his talents "AS PRESIDENT".

Re: Obama is not just a presidential candidate | Report to Admin

By salametti Dec 28th 2007 at 7:02 pm EST

u are correct

Re: Obama is not just a presidential candidate | Report to Admin

By Rebecca in Orlando Dec 28th 2007 at 9:22 pm EST

You are correct Tom! From one Floridian to another, I just hope our darn vote counts. But even if it does not, FL nominating Obama for President will cause yet another great bounce before Super Tuesday!

For the moment though, the weight of the nation rests on Iowa's shoulders...

FIRED UP!!

wow....this is breathe-taking!!! | Report to Admin

By salametti Dec 28th 2007 at 7:01 pm EST

+i cannot believe what i am hearing..it is earcandy!!!

+he is a blessing from god....i call him "the golden boy"

+lets get together!!!

+keep it up brother

+u sound great!!!

Re: wow....this is breathe-taking!!! | Report to Admin

By JQ Dec 29th 2007 at 10:04 am EST

Yes he's a give from GOD and his image at the top of the website looks like his coming out through the clouds. LOL!!!!!

des moines video | Report to Admin

By Alison from New York, NY Dec 28th 2007 at 7:26 pm EST

great speech= im down!

Dec 27th Obama Speech | Report to Admin

By Dory from Albuquerque, NM Dec 29th 2007 at 4:26 pm EST

He hit it out of the park! Everything is in this speech & this is how Obama will win.

Now, everybody get to work to get Obama's victory in Iowa & beyond.

Go Obama!

Handmade Obama Poster | Report to Admin

By Tenaya Dec 30th 2007 at 5:46 pm EST

Greetings!
I have created a hand-drawn Obama '08 poster~ take a look:

http://www.flickr.com/photo...

You are welcome to download it and post it in your area. If you would like me to send you a hard copy through the postal mail shoot me an email with your snail mail address at:

fairfaxforobama@gmail.com

If you enjoy the poster or decide to use it, I invite you to make a donation to the campaign in my honor at my personal fundraising page:

Link

Warm wishes,
Tenaya

OBAMA 08 | Report to Admin

By Kyle Lee Jan 1st 2008 at 11:25 pm EST

Here is our next President of the United States

Through the Eyes of a Republican... | Report to Admin

By Mark from OH Jan 2nd 2008 at 7:50 pm EST

I'm a born and raised Republican. For years, I unquestioningly followed the Republican party, and I never really knew why I felt that loyalty. Maybe it was because of my parents (especially my father), who are both very, very Republican. All I know for sure is that while I was doing a project for school in which we have to describe a presidential candidate and talk about their campaign for nomination, I took a great interest in Barack Obama.

This is the first election that I will be allowed to vote in, and God-willing that Mr. Obama is nominated the Democratic candidate, he will have my vote. He is such a charismatic, energetic person, and I am at a loss as to how anyone could support Clinton. Whereas Obama provides real, feasible solutions to real problems, all Clinton does is stir up her supporters at debates and such with energetic words that have no significant meaning, as well as flip flop her position on several issues.

Among other things, he has accurately portrayed the Iraq War and the early raids in Afghanistan- the place where we needed to be, but weren't. Sure, America has every right to be the world police, but Iraq was not our most immediate threat- Al Qaida was, and because of our recent "letting up" in Afghanistan, they have grown stronger than ever. They are the ones that killed 3,000 people, not a tyrant several thousands of miles away. Although I do feel he needed to be removed, now was not the time to do it, especially because there is no hard evidence that he was connected with the terrorist power at all.

Sorry, got off subject... :)

I feel that Obama truly gives us the best chance for change, and I am not afraid to admit that I am a Republican that will possibly be voting for a Democrat in November if he is nominated.

Re: Through the Eyes of a Republican... | Report to Admin

By Cyndy D. Jan 4th 2008 at 6:48 am EST

I admire you for voting with your heart and head...and not merely with your party! I am hopeful that this is the beginning of a new UNITED STATES of AMERICA!As an Independent, I am honored to join you in your support of Barack Obama!

Independants for Obama | Report to Admin

By Pamela from Perkasie, PA Jan 2nd 2008 at 10:01 pm EST

I live in Pennsylvania...I am not part of this caucus....I believe in the change Barack Obama has to bring to this table. I urge all of the people to get out and do it because otherwise, we will be stuck in the same whitehouse crap that has gone on for years...argghhh...look at US, we are a mess and another polital machine will only make us worse...and to the rest of the world WE NEED TO STAND UP! GET OUT OF FEAR ! Lets try this guy out..I am voting for him.
Woman 48 single unemployed, gave Barack 125.00 a little at a time over the last year. Didnt even hurt my grocery bill much!

Reader Comments	Comments RSS
Comments are closed for this post.