Skip To Content
Skip To Navigation
Get Local! Create Your MyBO Account (
or Login
)
Nearly There! Provide Your Name
Welcome! Login to MyBO (
or create your account
)
Almost Done! Create a Password
My Home
My Dashboard
My Blog
My Messages
Community
My Neighborhood
My Groups
Find Groups
My Friends
People Near Me
Events
Find Local Events
Host an Event
Manage My Events
Fundraise
Logout
Organizing for America
Sign-Up
OFA Home
About OFA
Issues
Volunteer
OFA Blog
Store
Donate
Community Blogs
Login
|
Register
|
Search Blogs
John Hague's Blog
View Full Profile »
About The Author...
J. HAGUE, Community Advocate
(Gabriola Island, BC, Canada)
« Hide Full Profile
User Profile
User:
Name:
Nature, People and Business, in Harmony for Healthy, Prosperous and Sustainable Community Application of "triple bottom line planning and accountability" to policy formulation in energy, human rights and business.
China's Electric Cars and Dirty Coal Electric Production
By
J. HAGUE, Community Advocate
- Apr 2nd, 2009 at 4:18 pm EDT
"China Vies to Be World’s Leader in Electric Cars
http://www.nytimes.com/todaysheadlines
By KEITH BRADSHER
In a new threat to Detroit, China is investing heavily in hybrid and electric-vehicle technology with a plan built on research, recharging stations and incentives."
What are we waiting for?
China needs clean electricity, we need clean cars.
With what we now know, can we not "leap frog" to an advanced
level of clean electricity production and optimal use?
There must be some better use for China's dirty coal than to pollute its
air and damage the health of its flora and fauna. And there must be alternatives
to expanding nuclear fission-electricity production.
I have floated the idea of "energy farms" in previous e-mails. Something like this
might be among the answers for not only China, but for many other nations, especially those
with tidal potential or virtually firm sun/wind combinations.
Tidal, wind, sunlight, municipal waste, ( any local renewables ) all, on or near the same site - "energy farm".
Produce at the maximal production function for all resources concurrently, and with the surplus electricity*, produce and store it as hydrogen, for use when one or more of the renewable sources are at sub--optimal levels. ( *surplus is determined by the difference between average "firm" production and maximal production; "deficit" would be the mirror image of "surplus" and require "topping up" to maintain average firm production from the total energy farm ). The stored hydrogen, if in sufficient supply, could also be used as an emergency "peak power" supplemental resource. The stored hydrogen is the "battery" or "resevoir" of the system enabling all the otherwise "non firm" renewables to be firmed up - much like our massive hydro-electric resevoirs here in British Columbia. There will be production losses and the need for sophisticated process computer controls to balance the system provides another outlet for North American know-how.
We know how to do this. On a net social benefit to cost analysis, I challenge anyone to do better. Properly balanced, this energy farm could produce and utilize "surplus" hydrogen at no economic cost!
So, who needs convincing? This could be a potent economic renewal project.
Comments?
John Hague - BA, CA, Mediator,
"Creative Conflict Services, BC" :: "NATURE, PEOPLE, BUSINESS, In Harmony"
Mail to a Friend
|
Link
|
Comments (0)
|
Report Objectionable Content
Posts
Content on blogs in My.BarackObama represents the opinions of community members and in no way should be interpreted as endorsed or approved by the campaign.
My Home
Community
My Neighborhood
My Groups
My Friends
Find Friends
Events
Find Events
Host an Event
Manage my Events
Contact voters
Fundraising
Messages
Blog
View All Blogs
Search All Blogs
Action Center
Resources